• Research
  • People
  • Publications
  • Developed tools
  • Opportunities
  • Links
  • Research
  • People
  • Publications
  • Developed tools
  • Opportunities
  • Links

Publications

For an updated list of publications, please visit Dr Muller's Google Scholar page
Papers in review are marked with an asterisk (*).
Student and postdoc mentees are underlined and marked with #
Click on the title to access abstract, then click on the authors to access preprints

5. Comparing statistical and process-based flow duration curve models in ungauged basins and changing rain regimes.

6/19/2021

 
​Müller, M.F. and Thompson, S.E (2016) Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, doi: 10.5194/hess-20-669-2016, 2016
The prediction of flow duration curves (FDCs) in ungauged basins remains an important task for hydrologists given the practical relevance of FDCs for water management and infrastructure design. Predicting FDCs in ungauged basins typically requires spatial interpolation of statistical or model parameters. This task is complicated if climate becomes non-stationary, as the prediction challenge now also requires extrapolation through time. In this context, process-based models for FDCs that mechanistically link the streamflow distribution to climate and landscape factors may have an advantage over purely statistical methods to predict FDCs.

This study compares a stochastic (process-based) and statistical method for FDC prediction in both stationary and non-stationary contexts, using Nepal as a case study. Under contemporary conditions, both models perform well in predicting FDCs, with Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients above 0.80 in 75 % of the tested catchments. The main drivers of uncertainty differ between the models: parameter interpolation was the main source of error for the statistical model, while violations of the assumptions of the process-based model represented the main source of its error. The process-based approach performed better than the statistical approach in numerical simulations with non-stationary climate drivers. The predictions of the statistical method under non-stationary rainfall conditions were poor if (i) local runoff coefficients were not accurately determined from the gauge network, or (ii) streamflow variability was strongly affected by changes in rainfall. A Monte Carlo analysis shows that the streamflow regimes in catchments characterized by frequent wet-season runoff and a rapid, strongly non-linear hydrologic response are particularly sensitive to changes in rainfall statistics. In these cases, process-based prediction approaches are favored over statistical models.

Comments are closed.

    Categories

    All
    Armed Conflict
    Bangladesh
    Cambodia
    Catchment Science
    Causal Inference
    Change Attribution
    Climate Change
    Flow Duration Curve
    Food
    Game Theory
    Geostatistics
    Global Health
    Groundwater
    Himalaya
    Large Scale Land Aquisition
    Micro Hydropower
    Middle East
    Nepal
    Remote Sensing
    Reviews And Opinion Papers
    Rural Electrification
    Salinization
    Sociohydrology
    South Asia
    Stochastic Hydrology
    Streamflow Variability
    Switzerland
    Transboundary Water
    Water System Analysis
    Web Platform

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.